Immunization Information Systems to Increase Vaccination Rates a Community Guide Systematic Review

Context

Vaccines are considered 1 of the most constructive prevention tools used inside public health to preclude vaccine-preventable diseases (VPD) amidst children, adolescents, and adults. Through vaccinations, the United states has experienced declines in incidence of morbidity, disability, and mortality from VPD.¹ ^, ⁱⁱ Recommended childhood vaccinations that protect against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, Haemophilus flu type b (Hib), poliovirus, measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis B, varicella, hepatitis A, pneumococcal, and rotavirus forbid approximately 20 million affliction episodes and 42 000 premature deaths, resulting in estimated internet savings of $68.viii billion (2009 dollar) from averted medical costs and reduced absence from work.³

Although the success of childhood vaccination programs has led to more than 95% decline in these infectious diseases, cases of disease and decease by VPD still occur, equally evidenced by the measles outbreak during 1989-1991 attributable to unvaccinated or undervaccinated persons.^4–6 Immunization programs and vaccination providers remain challenged to identify unvaccinated and undervaccinated subpopulations and individuals, ensure that individuals are appropriately vaccinated, and conduct outreach and interventions to maintain loftier vaccination coverage levels.

Apply of an immunization information organization (IIS) is i strategy that can exist adopted to increment and improve vaccination delivery in the U.s.. Immunization data systems are confidential, population-based, computerized databases that record all vaccination doses administered by participating providers to people residing within a given geopolitical area.⁷ These information systems take multiple clinical and public health functions, all of which assist in ensuring advisable vaccination to reduce risk for VPD.

Based on the results of a systematic review, the Community Preventive Services Chore Force (Chore Force) recently recommended use of IIS as an effective intervention to increment vaccination rates.⁸ Later on, this systematic economic review was conducted to evaluate costs and benefits associated with implementing, operating, and participating with an IIS.

Economical evaluations of technologically based interventions are challenging because of the speed and complexity of engineering alter. This challenge is peculiarly applicable to IIS, as systems have undergone major advancements since inception in the 1970s. This review identified the following 5 factors in the dynamic nature of IIS that complicate economic evaluation: (i) development of organization technology; (two) evolution of data commutation methodologies; (3) emergence of software vendors that support IIS; (iv) continued enhancements to system functionality; and (5) shift in the scope of IIS. With these factors in listen, this economical evaluation was conducted and assessed, and the results were compared with criteria of mod systems and capabilities.

Costs and benefits of IIS

Historically, in the United States, funding for IIS evolution has been provided by federal, land, local governments, private foundations, and managed intendance organizations (MCOs).^nine ^, ¹⁰ Implementing IIS requires upfront investment from these payers, whereas the benefits—both financial and nonfinancial—accrue to the payers, providers, patients, and the general population. For example, using an IIS to forbid a duplicative vaccination reduces costs to the patient (eg, money, time, and pain of vaccination) and also reduces costs to providers, public health officials, and the general population by allocating fewer public and private resources to administrate vaccines.

Expected costs of implementing an IIS include system costs (costs to develop and operate the IIS, to populate data at the central IIS, hardware and software costs, and/or licensing fees) and the cost of exchanging immunization data. Tables 1 and two, respectively, provide an overview of organisation costs for 2 types of IIS and data exchange costs. Data exchange costs accrue to both the provider and the IIS. Data substitution costs to the provider include labor costs to enter data manually into IIS or costs associated with linking an existing software system (eg, an electronic wellness record) to IIS. Data exchange costs to IIS include identifying, enrolling, and training providers on apply of IIS and establishing electronic linkages with other information systems, which incurs both operational and technical costs.

T1-4 — TABLE 1:
• System Price: Cost of Implementing and Operating an IIS

T2-4 — TABLE 2:
• Data Exchange Cost: Cost of Exchanging Data With an IIS

Economic benefits of IIS may include improved clinical service for vaccine administration and reduced administrative burdens associated with a vaccine delivery system. The ability of IIS to produce consolidated vaccination histories and to forecast (typically algorithm-based) which vaccinations are due and when those doses are due for each private served by the system can support immunization providers in improving vaccination coverage and reducing overimmunization. Authoritative back up functions for vaccine delivery provided by IIS include increased efficiency of provider reminder functions, generation of reminder/recollect notices for patients, and assessment and feedback interventions for providers.⁷ Immunization information systems may likewise exist used to rail vaccine stock and appraise immunization activeness for a provider practise. Improved vaccine supply and management should consequence in less waste and more than accurate vaccine inventory and less time required to create vaccination coverage and assessment reports for the provider practise and the population. Ultimately, IIS can pb to an increment in appropriate vaccinations, which results in reduced VPD, an associated reduction in morbidity and mortality, and an improvement in quality-adapted life-years. A reduction in morbidity and mortality is quantified as an economical outcome by measuring averted health care costs and productivity loss averted.

Evidence Conquering

A systematic review of economic evaluation studies is typically conducted for community-based interventions recommended by the Task Force. Methods used by the Guide to Community Preventive Services (Customs Guide) in conducting systematic reviews of economical evaluations are described elsewhere.¹¹ ^, ¹² To be eligible for inclusion in this economical review, studies had to satisfy the intervention definition stipulated in the effectiveness review—confidential, population-based, computerized databases that tape all vaccination doses administered by participating providers to people residing within a given geopolitical expanse. Immunization systems that include multiple providers in a geographic area and represent a majority of a population are considered population-based for the purposes of this assessment. Search of the economic literature likewise mirrored the effectiveness search menses of January 1994 to March 2012⁷ and combined economic-specific key words such equally cost, cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, and cost utility with the effectiveness search terms. In addition to the databases searched in the effectiveness review (ie, The Cochrane Library; MEDLINE; CINAHL; PsycINFO; ERIC; Sociological Abstracts; Web of Knowledge; EMBASE; and CAB International), EconLit, Social Sciences Citations Index, JSTOR, and Google were used. All monetary values were adjusted to 2011 Usa dollars, using the general Consumer Toll Index from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (www.bls.gov/).

To have into account the scale of IIS and increase comparability between studies, the Community Guide Economic science Squad (the Team) calculated cost per child vaccinated past using other measures provided in each study if this average price information was not provided.

Prove Synthesis

The economic search resulted in 71 potentially relevant studies afterward title and abstract screening. Afterward a review of the total text of these studies, 12 published articles⁹ ^, ^13–23 and two government reports²⁴ ^, ²⁵ were included every bit the final body of evidence. All studies assessed IIS in a US setting and focused on pediatric immunizations. Nine of these studies provided information related to either arrangement costs or information exchange costs, and 9 provided information on benefits; 4 studies provided an cess of both benefits and costs.

Organisation toll

Vii studies⁹ ^, ¹⁴ ^, ¹⁶ ^, ^eighteen ^, ²¹ ^, ²² ^, ²⁵ evaluated IIS organisation cost (see Tabular array 3), which includes costs of developing the system compages, software, hardware, hardware configuration, populating the database, and training. Operation costs are the costs of maintaining the system and managing records. Iii⁹ ^, ¹⁴ ^, ²¹ studies combined the cost of bringing providers online—equipment, data entry costs of the provider, and/or training costs—with development cost. Unfortunately, the studies did not stratify costs to distinguish systems cost from data exchange cost. Total costs ranged from $205 077 to $108 meg, almanac cost per child ranged from $5.xl to $60.82, and toll per vaccination record ranged from $0.eleven to $12.88. Variability in costs might be attributable to the scale of the IIS and the target population size. Three studies¹⁶ ^, ¹⁸ ^, ²¹ evaluated a metropolis IIS, whereas 2 studies^xiv ^, ²² evaluated a combination of urban center/state (or county) IIS. 1 study²⁵ solely evaluated a state IIS, whereas an boosted report⁹ focused on a national projection.

T3-4 — Tabular array 3:
• Arrangement Costs Reported in the Included Studies

Data exchange costs

2¹⁹ ^, ²⁰ studies reported information exchange costs associated with IIS (come across Table 4). I study²⁰ reported operational costs from the provider perspective of reporting vaccination information to a central registry, and some other study¹⁹ estimated costs for a MCO to link to an existing IIS to better reporting for the Healthcare Effectiveness and Information Information Set, quality measurement, and the doc incentive program. Data exchange costs ranged from $8395 to $33 459. No evaluated studies reported explicit data exchange costs accrued by IIS. As mentioned previously, these costs were included in the development costs from iii studies.⁹ ^, ¹⁴ ^, ²¹

T4-4 — Tabular array iv:
• Data Exchange Costs Reported in the Included Studies

Benefits

9 studies^nine ^, ¹³ ^, ^fifteen ^, ^17–19 ^, ^23–25 focused on savings that could accrue from using an IIS. Most studies focused on administrative efficiency of an IIS in contrast to manually performed vaccination-related activities (eg, pulling records [wellness care and education system], contacting previous providers for vaccination histories, and generating immunization-related reports). Four studies⁹ ^, ^fifteen ^, ²³ ^, ²⁵ considered reduction in costs that would event from decreased overvaccination. Of these studies, 2^xv ^, ²³ estimated benefits of IIS during a public health emergency, a rare but critical event. To estimate potential savings from reduced vaccination duplication, both studies causeless that every record identified retrospectively through the Louisiana IIS, LINKS (Louisiana Immunization Network for Kids Statewide), represented savings from avoiding revaccination of children displaced during Hurricane Katrina. This assumption—that every child with a record in the LINKS would accept been revaccinated in the absence of the arrangement—likely leads to an overestimate of authoritative savings; however, the guess does not account for unnecessary pain and the inconvenience of reimmunization, nor for the costs associated with lost work time and school absenteeism considering of vaccination appointments.¹⁵ The other studies^nine ^, ²⁵ modeled all potential benefits from reduced overvaccination (in addition to other benefits) on the basis of assumptions designated past the authors.

Benefits evaluated in these studies were generally specific to savings associated with administrative efficiency and decreased overvaccination and thus provide a limited motion picture of benefits that might exist realized with IIS. No studies evaluated economic benefits that outcome from reduced morbidity and mortality from VPD. Benefit outcomes evaluated in the included studies are presented in Table 5.

T5-4 — TABLE 5:
• Benefits of IIS Considered in the Included Studies

Price-benefit

4 studies^ix ^, ^xviii ^, ¹⁹ ^, ²⁵ provided an assessment of benefits and program costs, each focusing on a different perspective (national, local city/state, or health intendance system). One study^nine modeled toll and benefits of a nationwide IIS and indicated a do good-cost ratio of iii.5:one. A country-level study²⁵ modeled anticipated yearly benefits; compared with annual IIS costs to the state, the benefit-price ratio was i.59:1. At the metropolis level,^eighteen one evaluation institute that using an IIS compared with manually performing immunization activities resulted in net savings of $36 815. Among wellness care systems, a MCO¹⁹ estimated a return of $8 for every $1 spent after linking to a state IIS for electronic data reporting versus manually retrieving claims information.

Conclusions

Toll studies in this review provide information on costs to implement and operate the organization and associated costs to participate and exchange information with an IIS. Studies with benefit information focused on administrative efficiency of clinical vaccination activities and savings resulting from decreased overvaccination. A major claiming to evaluating a engineering science-based intervention is the development that comes with technology improvements and advancements. To determine whether cost and do good estimates from the evaluation provide insight into the economic efficiency of present-day IIS, the IISs evaluated in the included body of show are compared with standards of more recent systems (discussed in the next section). To assess whether the testify reflects mechanisms, capabilities, and scale of present-twenty-four hour period IIS, the Squad considered system engineering, use of vendor support, data substitution methods, system functionality, and telescopic of IIS.

Relevance of findings

Six of the studies that assessed IIS systems cost date from 1997 to 2002 and thus reflect an IIS created at least ten years before the evidence was gathered in 2012. As would be expected with a engineering science-based intervention, IIS system technology has evolved over time. When IISs were starting time developed in the United States, these systems primarily used mainframe technology with express or no network connectivity. Every bit the engineering infrastructure improved, virtually IISs transitioned to client-server estimator systems that enabled more automated data substitution by using a networked arroyo. Costs associated at this phase involved purchasing servers to support the IIS and it staff to maintain server functionality. Although many IISs keep to utilise client-server technologies, some are exploring use of cloud-based technology, which distributes computing infrastructure exterior the organization, with more advanced networking. Costs associated with cloud-based technology are expected to be less than those associated with client-server technologies because of economies of calibration and efficiency improvements and requirement of lower upward-forepart costs.²⁶ ^, ²⁷ Unfortunately, only ane study¹⁶ discussed details of the technological setup of the IIS. 2 types of arrangement technology were represented in the unmarried written report—mainframe architecture and customer-server architecture. No studies reported costs associated with deject-based technology.

Another development in IIS development has been the emergence of software vendors that support IIS. Most IISs were originally developed, coded, quality tested, and maintained by in-house information technology staff. Several major vendors now support IIS implementers. In 2013, 77% (43/56) of immunization programs in the U.s. were supported by IIS vendors (L. P., unpublished data, 2014). Considering no studies included in this review evaluated costs of vendor-supported IIS, expenses associated with utilize of this engineering science compared with original in-house systems were not articulate. Withal, information technology can exist postulated that vendor-supported systems incur lower evolution and maintenance costs, particularly for IIS that are less customized. Vendor-supported software allows implementers to take reward of investments already fabricated in software development by the vendor, likewise as predecessors who customized components of the organization, rather than developing a arrangement in-business firm. Correspondingly, some states have as well shared costs in developing and implementing an IIS. In this review, many IISs in the studies correspond the early adopters of IIS and thus are expected to have higher costs for using a new applied science with no precedent system.

Third, methods for immunization data exchange have also changed over fourth dimension. When IISs were start developed, immunization data was sent from the IIS on diskettes to vaccination providers who and so loaded that data onto locally supported computer systems, updated that information with new vaccinations, and returned diskettes to the IIS. Other users relied primarily on newspaper reporting, which required that vaccination providers tape immunization information on standard forms and mail or fax that data to the IIS. As the Internet became widely used, IIS transitioned to Web-based reporting systems so that providers could log on to a secure IIS Web site, so retrieve and submit immunization information in real time. As computers and electronic systems became commonplace in provider practices (eg, electronic billing systems and electronic health records), many providers and IIS developed capacity to commutation immunization information electronically between these systems. Electronic data exchange originally relied on batch reporting, in which data were queued up and sent to receiving systems at scheduled times. However, advances in organisation technologies, combined with use of Health Level 7 (HL7) standards, a nationally recognized standard for electronic data exchange between systems storing health data, have farther supported the power of IIS and provider-based systems to exchange data bidirectionally in real time. Costs associated with electronic data commutation include cost of information technology staff to maintain and support electronic information exchange for both the provider and the IIS. Only 2 studies provided information on data commutation costs.¹⁹ ^, ²⁰ Of these studies, ane measured costs associated with manual data entry performed by clinic personnel versus a billing or patient management organisation.²⁰ However, it is unclear whether that report deemed for the technician costs to link the system to the IIS; the study reported only time and equipment costs. The other study is from the perspective of an MCO and included toll of linking existing internal electronic systems to IIS.^nineteen The MCO did non directly input data into the IIS; consequently, the guess might be applicable to a provider with an electronic health record system.

4th, rapid advances in computing and technology have produced numerous benefits by enabling new functions and improving existing functions. Generally speaking, IISs were originally developed to primarily consolidate vaccination histories across multiple providers to provide clinical decision support, conduct reminder/recall, and monitor vaccination coverage. Nonetheless, in recent years, the functions and features of IIS have expanded to support the diverse needs of multiple immunization stakeholders, such equally vaccine ordering and inventory management functions and emergency preparedness back up, and have improved reporting functions to better accost geographic pockets of needs (L. P., unpublished data, 2014). Almost benefits in this torso of bear witness focused on reduction of labor and time costs that accrued from using computerized versus manual systems. Although 4 studies evaluated potential savings that would result from reduced duplicative immunizations because of better tracking and consolidated access of patient immunization records, the modeled/partially modeled findings have limitations because of their assumptions and hypothetical projections.

The addition and expansion of IIS functionality is associated both with costs, which are unclear, and benefits. This review provides only a minor glimpse into the economical benefits that upshot from implementation of IIS. The absence of reporting many of the expected benefits does result in an underestimation; however, it is important to note that the benefits evaluated in this review are relevant to current IIS systems and can be viewed as the minimum benefits that tin can be expected.

Finally, IIS economies of scale take changed. Many of the IISs in this review focused on citywide systems. Today, most of these city-based systems take been consolidated into a state-based IIS that serves a larger population, helping to reduce costs associated with developing, maintaining, and connecting multiple smaller-scale systems. Immunization information systems have also expanded their original focus of babyhood vaccinations to include adolescents and adults. As more IISs incorporate vaccine administration data for adults, either through adding adult patients to the system or as individuals already enrolled in the IIS age into adulthood, the capabilities of IIS volition become more universally applicable to individuals of all ages. Ninety percent (53/56) of immunization programs are supported by an IIS that serves the life span and have become universally applicable to individuals of all ages (L. P., unpublished survey, 2014). The expansion of populations served increases the volume of data received, processed, and reported. Unfortunately, costs associated with enhancing IIS to be able to support this increase in volume were non available. With these limitations in listen, Table half dozen provides a summary of why the evidence provided in the included studies might be less relevant in determining costs of a present-day IIS.

T6-4 — Tabular array vi:
• Relevance and Limitations of Evidence Findings

Summary of findings

Based on the limitations discussed in this article, evidence in this review might not accurately represent present-twenty-four hour period IIS; still, information technology is unlikely that the ratio of economic benefits to costs is any less favorable. Every bit IIS functionality has improved, benefits are expected to be greater than what is captured in this review. With multiple factors influencing price—potentially lowering costs through advancements in technology, introduction of vendor-supported IIS, and increase in calibration, and potentially raising costs through improved functionality—it is unclear how nowadays-twenty-four hour period costs would compare with costs reflected in the studies. However, it is unlikely that costs increased at the same magnitude every bit benefits, which were underestimated in this review; costs might also potentially exist lower. Therefore, it is likely that more up-to-date estimates of costs and benefits would support the findings of price savings in this review. In improver, more research is needed to update and address the limitations in available evidence and enable an assessment of economic costs and benefits of a present-day IIS.

Evidence Gaps

More economical data are needed on the costs of implementing present-day IIS, with information detailing whether the system is developed in-business firm or vendor supported. Details of system engineering would exist helpful in comparing each type of technology with its associated costs. This body of evidence primarily captured the economical benefit of reducing reporting burden and time spent locating records. Additional benefits (improved efficiencies and decreased time associated with conducting provider reminder/retrieve functions, provider assessment and feedback efforts, improved vaccine supply and management, and reduced morbidity and mortality) demand to exist monetized to fully capture the economic returns that accumulate from using an IIS.

Lastly, the number of direct linkages betwixt IIS and electronic health records (EHRs) are increasing in role due to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Meaningful Use initiative that provides financial incentives to eligible health intendance providers that acquire and demonstrate meaningful utilise of certified EHR products, which includes the substitution of data with IIS.²⁸ Equally more than providers create direct linkage from EHRs to the key IIS, more than information and details are needed most the costs of this type of connection.

Discussion

This review provides an initial assessment of costs and benefits of implementing an IIS. Every bit systems accept evolved over fourth dimension through technological innovation, in coordination with implementer input, competition, and experience, new approaches accept been developed to build IISs that are more streamlined, operate faster, and accept more capabilities. All included studies provide insight into the types of costs that might be incurred for implementers interested in edifice an IIS; however, dollar figures are less relevant because the systems evaluated are outdated.

The master difficulty in assessing economical evidence was the rapid alter in technology costs. As health information systems are increasingly adopted beyond public health settings, understanding upfront and ongoing costs, alternative costs of software, and associated benefits is primal to determining the value of interventions. Notwithstanding, with continued rapid advancement of technology, challenges faced in this review will likely be a trouble for other technology-based reviews. One approach might be to restrict the search inclusion criteria to exclude older applied science or categorize the relevance of studies by comparison with more recent engineering science.

Reporting costs faced by vaccine providers who participate in IIS were also reviewed. Advancements in technology now allow providers to share immunization information through a direct link to the cardinal IIS. However, cost barriers exist for providers to create the direct linkage, and significant administrative efforts and trainings might exist required to re-engineer and align the providers' immunization practices to have total advantages of functionality efficiencies of IIS.^sixteen

Another public wellness goal is to integrate a vaccine-ordering module inside an IIS that interfaces with the Centers for Illness Control and Prevention'south Vaccine Tracking System for ordering and managing vaccine distribution.²⁹ Linking systems would streamline the process and potentially save coin by reducing errors and waste material and ensure that appropriate supplies of vaccines are distributed to providers.

REFERENCES

ane. Roush SW, Murphy Television set. Vaccine-Preventable Disease Table Working Grouping. Historical comparisons of morbidity and mortality for vaccine-preventable diseases in the The states. JAMA. 2007;298(18):2155–2163.

2. Centers for Affliction Control and Prevention. Ten smashing public health achievements—United States, 2001-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;sixty(xix):619–623.

Cited Hither |
PubMed

3. Zhou F, Shefer A, Wenger J, et al. Economic evaluation of the routine childhood immunization program in the United States, 2009. Pediatrics. 2014;133(4):577–585.

4. Fedson DS, Fulginiti VA, Flower BR, et al. Adult immunization. JAMA. 1994;272(fourteen):1133–1137.

v. Briss PA, Rodewald LE, Hinman AR, et al. Reviews of show regarding interventions to amend vaccination coverage in children, adolescents, and adults. The Task Strength on Community Preventive Services. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18(1S):97.

6. Orenstein WA, Papania MJ, Wharton ME. Measles emptying in the U.s.a.. J Infect Dis. 2004;189(1S):S1–S3.

7. Groom H, Hopkins D, Pabst L. Immunization information systems to increase vaccination rates: a Customs Guide systematic review. J Public Wellness Manag Pract. 2014;227–248.

Cited Here

8. Community Preventive Services Chore Force. Use of immunization information systems to increase vaccination rates: a recommendation of the Community Preventive Services Chore Force. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014;249–252.

Cited Here

nine. Horne PR, Saarlas KN, Hinman AR. Costs of immunization registries: experiences from the All Kids Count II projects. Am J Prev Med. 2000;19(two):94–98.

ten. Linkins RW, Salmon DA, Omer SB, Pan WKY, Stokley S, Halsey NA. Support for immunization registries among parents of vaccinated and unvaccinated school-aged children: a case control study. BMC Public Health 2006;6(1):236.

eleven. Carande-Kulis VG, Maciosek MV, Briss PA, et al. Methods for systematic reviews of economic evaluations for the guide to community preventive services. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18(1S):75–91.

12. Zaza S, Carande-Kulis VG, Sleet DA, et al. Methods for conducting systematic reviews of the evidence of effectiveness and economical efficiency of interventions to reduce injuries to motor vehicle occupants. Am J Prev Med. 2001;21(4S):23–30.

Cited Here |
PubMed

xiii. Bartlett DL. Cost savings associated with using immunization information systems for vaccines for children administrative tasks. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007;thirteen(6):559.

fourteen. Bartlett DL, Molinari NAM, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Urquhart GA. Economics of immunization information systems in the United states: assessing costs and efficiency. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2006;4(1):15.

Cited Here

15. Boom JA, Dragsbaek AC, Nelson CS. The success of an immunization information system in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Pediatrics. 2007;119(6):1213–1217.

sixteen. Fontanesi JM, Flesher DS Jr, De Guire M, Lieberthal A, Holcomb K. The toll of doing business: cost structure of electronic immunization registries. Health Serv Res. 2002;37(v):1291–1307.

17. Glazner JE, Beaty BL, Pearson KA, Lowery NE, Berman Southward. Using an immunization registry: upshot on exercise costs and time. Ambul Pediatr. 2004;4(1):34–40.

18. McKenna VB, Sager A, Gunn JE, Tormey P, Barry MA. Immunization registries: costs and savings. Public Health Rep. 2002;117(four):386.

19. O'Connor Air-conditioning, Layton CM, Osbeck TJ, Hoyle TM, Rasulnia B. Wellness program use of immunization information systems for quality measurement. Health. 2010;16:217–224.

Cited Here

20. Rask KJ, Wells KJ, Kohler SA, Rust CT, Cangialose CB. The toll to providers of participating in an immunization registry. Am J Prev Med. 2000;nineteen(two):99–103.

21. Rask KJ, Wells KJ, Kohler SA, Rust CT, Cangialose CB. Measuring immunization registry costs: promises and pitfalls. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18(iii):262–267.

22. Slifkin RT, Freeman VA, Biddle AK. Costs of developing childhood immunization registries: case studies from four All Kids Count Projects. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999;five:67–81.

23. Urquhart GA, Williams W, Tobias J, Welch FJ. Immunization information systems use during a public health emergency in the United States. J Public Wellness Manag Pract. 2007;thirteen(5):481–485.

24. Florida Bureau of Immunization. Florida SHOTS time savings study results. http://www.flshots.com/_pdfs/TimeSavingsStudyFlyer.pdf. Published 2009. Accessed August 2, 2010.

Cited Hither

25. Virginia Section of Health. 12 VAC five-115- Virginia immunization data organization economic impact analysis. Virginia Section of Planning and Budget. Va Regist Regul. 2012;29(6). http://register.dls.virginia.gov/details.aspx?id=3286. Accessed February three, 2013.

Cited Hither

26. Marks G. Do y'all supersede your server or become to the cloud? The answer may surprise y'all. www.forbes.com/sites/quickerbettertech/2013/04/29/exercise-you-replace-your-server-or-go-to-the-cloud-the-answer-may-surprise-you/. Publi-shed 2013. Accessed Jan five, 2014.

Cited Hither

27. Potter K. Cloud Computing: Economic, Fiscal and Service Bear upon on Information technology Planning Assumptions. Stamford, CT: Gartner Inc; 2013.

Cited Hither

29. Centers for Affliction Command and Prevention. PPHF 2012—Prevention and Public Health Fund (Affordable Care Deed)—Capacity building assistance to strengthen public health immunization infrastructure and performance financed in role by 2012 Prevention and Public Health Funds. https://www.cfda.gov/?southward=program&mode=form&tab=step1&id=256e273b6e05d96d1b298d67f28a2d43. Accessed Feb 20, 2014.

Cited Here

Keywords:

benefit; Community Guide; Community Preventive Services Job Force; toll; toll-effectiveness; economics; immunization; immunization data organization; systematic review

bowerwitait.blogspot.com

Source: https://journals.lww.com/jphmp/fulltext/2015/05000/economic_review_of_immunization_information.4.aspx